Most accountants in UK think stamp duty listing tax is still unfair

The new system introduced in December overhauled how HMRC calculated stamp duty with the tax now only applying to the amount of the purchase price which fell within that particular duty band.

This prevented purchasers of listing valued slightly above a particular threshold being hit with a sudden increase leading it to be criticised as an anomalous ‘slab tax’.
 
However, some 55% of accountants still believe the system is unfair, according to research from Bloomsbury Professional, a leading tax and accounting information group. Of these, the largest proportion, 22% argued that stamp duty ought to be set more locally, to reflect regional conditions and enable it to be used, for example, as a measure to either boost or control local listing markets.
 
A further 20% of accountants felt that stamp duty remains too high overall whilst 13% felt that the tax is too high for more expensive listings.
 
‘It is significant that the greater proportion of accountants still feel that the stamp duty system is in need of an overhaul. The recent Summer Budget did not address the imbalances that many accountants feel is impacting the residential listing market,’ said Martin Casimir, managing director of Bloomsbury Professional.
 
‘The calls for stamp duty to be set locally are intriguing. The impact of such a change and how it could best be implemented is up for debate but it certainly shows that the devolution debate is becoming part of business’ mainstream thinking,’ he added.
 
When the new stamp duty rates were announced the government stated that 98% of home owners would pay less after the charges and only those buying listings worth more that £937,000 would pay more.
 
HMRC collected £10.7 billion in Stamp Duty tax in 2014/2015, a 36% increase over three years from £6.9 billion in 2012/2013.

BOOKMARK THIS PAGE (What is this?)     

Source: Property News Spain